5 Signs India Crypto Policy May Remain Unchanged After Election 2024

As India Election 2024 progresses through multiple phases, crypto enthusiasts and industry observers in the world’s largest democracy, are eagerly anticipating indications about the direction of crypto policy in the country. Although there is significant political excitement surrounding the elections, it appears that India’s position on cryptocurrencies will probably remain consistent during the next parliamentary session. Here are some compelling signs pointing towards the continuity of India’s current crypto regulations

1. Election Manifestos and Public Discourse

The manifestos from leading political parties like the Bharatiya Janta Party (BJP) and Indian National Congress (INC) in India, have noticeably left out any direct mentions of cryptocurrencies or blockchain technology. Instead, attention is centered on wider digitalization programs, indicating the lack of importance of crypto-related topics to voters. Public discussions are mainly focused on socio-political issues such as employment, secularism, and agrarian policies, leaving crypto as a less important topic.

This absence of crypto-specific promises indicates that the electoral landscape is unlikely to prompt immediate changes in India’s crypto policy. The prevailing priorities of political parties suggest that crypto regulation is not a pressing concern in the current political agenda.

2. Steadfast Regulatory Environment

Experts and analysts predict that strict cryptocurrency regulations will persist after the India election 2024. During its second term, Prime Minister Narendra Modi government’s strict tax and regulatory actions have greatly limited the expansion of the crypto industry. Inconsistent changes, like the recent prohibition of offshore exchanges, have not significantly altered the overall regulatory structure.

The absence of clear promises from political candidates along with the current regulatory landscape suggests a continuation in India’s cryptocurrency policy direction. The government’s lack of enthusiasm and preference for other technologies over cryptocurrencies indicate that sudden policy changes are improbable.

3. Absence of Opposition Narrative

The INC and other opposition parties have not effectively defined a clear position on crypto regulation, focusing more on challenging the BJP’s dominant electoral control. The opposition’s limited involvement in crypto-related issues, driven by a focus on winning elections, is solidifying the current situation.

The lack of a strong opposition viewpoint on crypto policy suggests that major changes to the current regulatory framework are unlikely in the short term. The political environment tends to show more inertia than active support for policies favorable to cryptocurrency.

4. Continued Government Ambiguity

Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman‘s recent comments, although somewhat unclear, indicate that there will be no changes to the current regulation of cryptocurrencies. The government recognizes crypto assets but is hesitant to make regulatory changes, showing a careful attitude towards the changing environment.

FM Nirmala Sitharaman spells India’s stance on crypto: ‘Cannot be currencies’ https://t.co/KdJr833iS3

— Gadgets 360 (@Gadgets360) March 15, 2024

The government’s lack of clarity shows a hesitancy to implement significant changes right after the elections. In spite of possible influence from business interests, the current perspective emphasizes a cautious attitude towards regulating cryptocurrencies.

5. Global Policy Influence and Digital Ambitions

India’s active involvement in influencing worldwide cryptocurrency policies, demonstrated through its leadership of the Group of 20 in 2023, highlights its desire for a cohesive regulatory structure. Additionally, the upcoming introduction of the digital rupee suggests a coming together of domestic and international digital goals, potentially affecting the direction of India’s cryptocurrency policy.

India’s involvement in global affairs and use of technology show a detailed strategy for regulating cryptocurrency based on worldwide standards and local needs. As the country progresses through its digital revolution, crypto regulations are expected to develop in alignment with overall economic goals.

Conclusion

Although India Election 2024 may attract attention and influence the country’s political direction, the effect on crypto policy seems to be minimal. The lack of clear election mandates, along with a consistent regulatory framework and worldwide ambitions, suggests that India’s cryptocurrency policy is likely to remain unchanged after the election. As the country begins its digital transformation, the path of cryptocurrency regulation is connected to larger economic needs and global influences.